- Home
- Publications
- Can Intangible Investment Explain The UK Productivity Puzzle?
Can intangible investment explain the UK productivity puzzle?
External Authors
Peter Goodridge, Jonathan Haskel and Gavin Wallis
Related Themes
Productivity, Trade, and Regional EconomiesJournal
, No. 224
External Resources
This paper investigates whether intangibles might explain the UK productivity puzzle. We note that since the recession: (a) firms have upskilled faster than before; (b) intangible investment in R&D and software has risen whereas tangible investment has fallen; and (c) intangible and telecoms equipment investment slowed in advance of the recession. We have therefore tested to see if: (a) what looks like labour hoarding is actually firms keeping workers who are employed in creating intangible assets; and (b) the current slowdown in TFP growth is due to the spillover effects of the past slowdown in R&D and telecoms equipment investment. Our main findings are: (a) measured market sector real value added growth since the start of 2008 is understated by 1.6 per cent due to the omission of intangibles; and (b) 0.75 per cent per annum of the TFP growth slowdown can be accounted for by the slowdown in intangible and telecoms investment in the early 2000s. Taken together intangible investment can therefore account for around 5 percentage points of the 16 per cent productivity puzzle.
Related Blog Posts
Exploring the Data on UK Productivity Performance
Issam Samiri
Stephen Millard
11 Dec 2023
4 min read
UK Investment Past and Prospects: A Framework for Analysis
Catherine Mann
01 Dec 2023
6 min read
Where Are We With Regional Inequalities in the UK?
Adrian Pabst
Jagjit S. Chadha
01 Nov 2023
5 min read
Related Projects
Related News
Related Publications
Productivity and Investment: Time to Manage the Project of Renewal
12 Mar 2024
UK Productivity Commission
UK Households Should Start Feeling Better Off as Election Looms
07 Feb 2024
UK Economic Outlook
Adam Smith and the Bankers: Retrospect and Prospect
04 Jan 2024
National Institute Economic Review