Downloads
DP487: The Household FallacyAuthors
External Authors
Zabczyk, P
Related Themes
Political EconomyJEL Code
E0, H62
Paper Category Number
487
We refer to the idea that government must ‘tighten its belt’ as a necessary policy response to higher indebtedness as the household fallacy. We provide a reason to be skeptical of this claim that holds even if the economy always operates at full employment and all markets clear. Our argument rests on the fact that, in an overlapping-generations (OLG) model, changes in government debt cause changes in the real interest rate that redistribute the burden of repayment across generations. We do not rely on the assumption that the equilibrium is dynamically inefficient, and our argument holds in a version of the OLG model where the real interest rate is always positive.
Related Blog Posts
What Can Policy Makers Learn From Adam Smith?
Sayantan Ghosal
Graeme Roy
11 Mar 2024
5 min read
Reflections on the 2024 Spring Budget: What Was and Wasn’t Addressed
Monica George Michail
Stephen Millard
11 Mar 2024
5 min read
How the Chancellor’s Budget Could Help Households and the Struggling Regions
Arnab Bhattacharjee
Robyn Smith
Adrian Pabst
04 Mar 2024
6 min read
Adam Smith’s Division of Labour in Today’s World of Global Markets
Diane Coyle
25 Jan 2024
4 min read
Related Projects
Related News
Related Publications
The Nature of the Inflationary Surprise in Europe and the USA
21 Mar 2024
Discussion Papers
Energy and Climate Policy in a DSGE Model of the United Kingdom
08 Mar 2024
Discussion Papers
Geopolitical Risks and the Global Economy
07 Feb 2024
Global Economic Outlook Box Analysis