- Home
- Publications
- Union Coverage, Membership And Performance- Related Pay: Are Piece Rates Different?
Union coverage, membership and performance- related pay: are piece rates different?
External Authors
Patrick O’Halloran
Related Themes
Political EconomyJournal
, No. 226
External Resources
This paper revisits a literature on the links between unionisation and performance-related pay (PRP), which offers a disparate set of results. Part of the reason for this is the usual inability to distinguish between different types of PRP and the lack of rich panel data containing such measures. Analysis of panel data containing six separate PRP schemes reveals that union members are less likely to receive PRP in general and less likely to receive bonus payments, stock options, or profit sharing than non-members. Furthermore, profit sharing is negatively related to both union membership and coverage. However, union members or those covered by a union contract are more likely to be paid piece rates, providing further evidence that piece-rate pay differs from other forms of PRP.
Related Blog Posts
What Can Policy Makers Learn From Adam Smith?
Sayantan Ghosal
Graeme Roy
11 Mar 2024
5 min read
Reflections on the 2024 Spring Budget: What Was and Wasn’t Addressed
Monica George Michail
Stephen Millard
11 Mar 2024
5 min read
How the Chancellor’s Budget Could Help Households and the Struggling Regions
Arnab Bhattacharjee
Robyn Smith
Adrian Pabst
04 Mar 2024
6 min read
Adam Smith’s Division of Labour in Today’s World of Global Markets
Diane Coyle
25 Jan 2024
4 min read
Related Projects
Related News
Related Publications
Geopolitical Risks and the Global Economy
07 Feb 2024
Global Economic Outlook Box Analysis
Adam Smith and the Bankers: Retrospect and Prospect
04 Jan 2024
National Institute Economic Review
On the Promises and Perils of Smithian Growth: From the Pin Factory to AI
04 Jan 2024
National Institute Economic Review